CMAReal estate agentsValuation

How to make price adjustments in a CMA (with examples)

12 min read

Pulling good comparable sales is only half of a comparative market analysis. The other half is adjustments: the amounts you add to or subtract from each comp's sale price to account for how it differs from the property you are valuing. Get the adjustments right and a handful of imperfect comps converge on a tight, defensible price range. Get them wrong and you can talk yourself into almost any number you like — which is exactly how agents lose listings or leave money on the table. This guide explains the method, the rules that keep you honest, and a full worked example.

Aerial view of a neighbourhood of similar but not identical houses, the kind of comparable properties an agent adjusts in a CMA
Photo by Michael Tuszynski on Unsplash.

Why adjustments exist at all

No two homes are identical, yet you need to compare them on equal terms. A comp that sold for €430,000 with an extra bathroom and a renovated kitchen is not telling you your subject is worth €430,000 — it is telling you a better home sold for that. Adjustments strip out those differences so every comp answers one clean question: "what would this property have sold for if it were as similar to the subject as possible?" Once each comp is adjusted to that common baseline, the prices should cluster, and the cluster is your evidence. If you skipped this step and simply averaged raw comp prices, you would be averaging apples, sheds and swimming pools.

The golden rule: adjust the comp, not the subject

This is where most mistakes start. You are trying to value the subject property, so its price is the unknown — you never touch it. You adjust the comps toward the subject. The direction follows one sentence: superior comp, subtract; inferior comp, add. If the comp has a garage and the subject does not, the comp is superior on that feature, so you subtract the garage's value from the comp. If the subject has a larger garden than the comp, the comp is inferior there, so you add. Write that rule at the top of your worksheet until it is automatic; reversing it inverts every number you produce.

Which features actually move price

You do not adjust for everything — only for differences large enough to change what a buyer would pay. The features that consistently matter:

  • Living area — usually the single biggest driver, priced per square metre or square foot.
  • Lot or plot size — especially where land is scarce.
  • Bedrooms and bathrooms — count and, for bathrooms, quality.
  • Condition and renovation — a new kitchen, bathroom or roof versus deferred maintenance.
  • Outdoor space and parking — garden, balcony, garage, off-street spaces.
  • Location nuance — a quiet street versus a busy road, a view, proximity to a school catchment.
  • Energy efficiency — increasingly priced in, as our guide on how to value a house explains.

How to put a number on each feature

An adjustment should reflect a feature's contributory value — what it adds to the sale price — not what it cost to build. A €25,000 kitchen renovation might add only €12,000 to the price; buyers pay for the outcome, not your invoice. The cleanest way to estimate contributory value is paired sales analysis: find two sold homes that are alike in every way except the one feature, and the price difference between them is that feature's value in this market. Two near-identical houses on the same street, one with a garage at €312,000 and one without at €300,000, imply a garage is worth about €12,000 here.

Paired data is not always available, so supplement it with local rules of thumb, cost-to-build figures discounted to contributory value, and a price-per-square-metre benchmark for the area. Whatever your source, be consistent across every comp and conservative on the size of each adjustment. Over-adjusting is how a CMA quietly drifts away from what the market will actually pay.

Keep adjustments within sane limits

Adjustments are a correction, not a rescue. A long-standing guideline from appraisal practice is to keep net adjustments (the total after the pluses and minuses cancel) within about 15 percent of a comp's sale price, and gross adjustments (every adjustment added up regardless of sign) within roughly 25 percent. If a comp needs bigger corrections than that to resemble the subject, it is simply too different to be a strong comparable. The fix is not a bigger adjustment — it is a better comp. This is why choosing the right comparable sales upfront does most of the work; tight comps need only light adjustments.

A full worked example

Suppose you are valuing a three-bedroom house of 110 m² with one bathroom, a small garden and no garage, in average-but-tidy condition. You have three strong sold comps. All figures are illustrative, to show the method rather than any real market.

Comp A — sold €430,000

110 m², three beds, but two bathrooms and a renovated kitchen the subject lacks. The comp is superior, so subtract: extra bathroom −€10,000, renovated kitchen −€12,000. Adjusted value: €408,000.

Comp B — sold €395,000

100 m², three beds, one bathroom, no garden. The comp is inferior on size and outdoor space, so add: 10 m² at €1,200/m² +€12,000, garden +€8,000. Adjusted value: €415,000.

Comp C — sold €455,000

120 m², three beds, one bathroom, with a garage. Superior on size and parking, so subtract: 10 m² −€12,000, garage −€12,000. Adjusted value: €431,000.

Raw, the comps spanned €395,000 to €455,000 — a €60,000 spread that tells you almost nothing. Adjusted, they cluster at €408,000 to €431,000, and the two closest matches (A and B, both 110 m² or near it) land at €408,000–€415,000. You would weight those most heavily and present a range of roughly €410,000 to €420,000, with Comp C as the supported ceiling. That is a number you can defend line by line in front of a seller — which is the whole point.

Present the adjustments, don't hide them

Clients trust a price they can see the working for. A clean adjustment grid — each comp, each feature, each plus and minus, the adjusted value — turns "I think it's worth about €415,000" into a documented argument. It also protects you: when the other side's agent or a low appraisal challenges your number, you have the evidence laid out. This is the step where dedicated software pays for itself. Instead of hand-building a spreadsheet, Biedradar lets you enter an address, pulls comparable sales and market signals, and generates a branded property analysis report with the comparison laid out — turning an hour of formatting into minutes so your time goes into the client conversation.

Automation handles the routine adjustments well, but it cannot see the north-facing living room, the assessment notice on the building or the renovation that never made the listing photos. Treat the tool's number as a fast, evidence-backed first draft and apply your local judgement on top. That blend — data speed plus human nuance — is what separates a CMA that wins listings from one that just fills a template. Once your range is set, our guide on how to price a listing covers turning that evidence into the right asking-price strategy, and the full CMA walkthrough shows where adjustments sit in the wider process.

Frequently asked questions

What are price adjustments in a CMA?

Price adjustments are the amounts you add to or subtract from a comparable sale's price to account for the ways it differs from the property you are valuing. If a comp has a feature your subject lacks, you subtract that feature's local value from the comp; if your subject has something the comp lacks, you add it. The aim is to estimate what each comp would have sold for if it were identical to the subject.

Do you adjust the comp or the subject property?

You always adjust the comp, never the subject. The subject is the fixed point you are trying to value, so its price is unknown. The golden rule is 'adjust the comp toward the subject': if the comp is superior, subtract; if the comp is inferior, add. Adjusting the subject instead is the single most common beginner mistake and it inverts every sign.

How do you decide how much each feature is worth?

Use paired sales analysis where you can: find two otherwise similar homes that differ in only one feature and the price gap is that feature's contributory value. Where paired data is thin, fall back on local cost-to-build figures, market rules of thumb and price-per-square-metre benchmarks. The value is what the feature adds to the sale price, not what it cost to install.

How large can adjustments be before a comp is unreliable?

A widely used guideline is that net adjustments should stay within roughly 15 percent and gross adjustments within about 25 percent of the comp's sale price. If a comp needs adjustments larger than that to fit the subject, it is too different to be a strong comparable. Find a closer match rather than adjusting a weak comp into shape.

Should online valuation tools handle the adjustments for you?

Automated valuation models and CMA software can apply data-driven adjustments in seconds, which is a huge time saver for the routine cases. But you still own the judgement calls: condition, layout quirks, a busy road, a renovation the data has not captured. Treat the automated number as a fast, evidence-backed starting point that you sanity-check, not a verdict.